truth@masteragency.com wrote:
WOW, BOB SCHULZ OF WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION, ALONG WITH PA's FORMER DEP. ATTORNEY GENERAL PHIL BERG, WAS FEATURED ON THE RUSSIAN TV
Click here to view. The story begins at 20:32 min and lasts until 24:28 min.
Posts
5 years ago
1 comment:
I congratulate these fine upstanding American Citizens for their courage against all odds to defend the constitution of the U.S. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen as the phrase was understood by the Framers of the Constitution when they wrote “ No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”. During that time it was well understood the meaning of natural born citizen - "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.". By law Obama at birth was a citizen of the U.S. And a citizen of the United Kingdom. The statutes defining him as a Citizen of the U.S. at birth were not intended to define the eligibility for President and do not include the term “natural born citizen” . At this time no court has ruled that the 14th Amendment and subsequent statutes were intended to clarify the meaning of “natural-born citizen”. Article X of the constitution says “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” It seems to me the authority(power) to determine the eligibility of the presidential candidate's has not been delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor is it prohibited by it to the states, therefore it is reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This seems to me to be sufficient authority for people of the United States to investigate and to determine the eligibility of a candidate for the presidency. So how can the Courts say that people don't have standing?
Post a Comment