1 year ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Obama Deception
Click image to watch trailer
Tabloid Truth Explodes
This issue is already selling out!!
Remember Leo's Case
Obama was born under the jurisdiction of a foreign power, Britain, and is therefore ineligible to serve as president of the United States, according to a lawsuit that has reached the Supreme Court. (click image)
We The People Foundation
Obama citizenship-birth info center (click image)
New Sons of Liberty Society
Chicago Tribune Ad For Obama Records
The original idea was to run a nationwide fullpage ad in USA Today to compell Barack Obama to produce records (click image for more)
Chicago Tribune Ad
This full-page Open Letter to Mr. Obama will be published in the Chicago Tribune on both Monday, December 1, 2008 and Wednesday, December 3, 2008. It will appear in the main news section (click image to view ad).
Listen to John Williams Interview Bob Schulz on WGN 720 AM in Chicago
(click image to listen)
Subscribe To USATodayAdForObamaRecords
Posts
Comments
My Blog List
-
-
15 years ago
-
3 comments:
The nation owes more than thanks to three unlikely modern day patriots: professional poker player, musician, and retired attorney, Leo Donofrio; life long Democrat and former Pennsylvania assistant attorney general, Phil Berg; and Soviet emigree and attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz (she’s also a dentist).
While Mr. Donofrio painstakingly established the airtight case that BHO could not be an Article II “natural born citizen” (at BHO’s birth, dad was British/Kenyan, not American, citizen) Leo’s Stay of the 12/15/08 electoral college vote was denied by SCOTUS as procedurally unripe.
Nevertheless, since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress — rendering moot the Berg and Taitz (Lightfoot) cases — Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the Friday 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case Friday 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.
Now that BHO is in checkmate and cannot be POTUS, he can be a patriot as well. He need not subject the nation to the expense and trauma of requiring SCOTUS to overrule his ‘Presidency’. BHO can and should voluntarily step down with Biden becoming Acting POTUS under the 20th Amendment, and under the agreement all potential claims by the Government for itself and on behalf of others against BHO are released.
Keyes is wrong on the UN issue.It was treason to enter it,have it on our soil,and have our armed forces be involved with it in any way,shape,or form.It is the housing for a Fascist NWO Global Government.Makes sense that our poiticians recently scored 40% on a civics test.If they do not know how our form of government operates,they have no clue on how to defend it.
This is interesting, of when the Ambassador gave the analogy of the deed to property, at 10:14 minutes into this 12 minute tape. Like when somebody challenged that they owned the real estate and SAID there was a deed over at the Registry, but did not bring it to the boundary line to prove it. - - - - The same could be said of the "; neither" boundary between qualifications #1; and 2 plus 3 in Art. II, Sec. 1, Clause 4 U.S. Constitution*. Is this neither word an adjective for "Not one or the other: Neither shoe fits" or a conjunctive word defined as Combined? Re: The "American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 @ pages 472 + 153 respectfully. "Usage: When all of the elements...are singular, the verb is always singular: Neither he nor she was told. When the elements are in the plural, the verb is plural." So who/what is/are the element(s) here*? It has to be NOT of the person, but of the qualifications. It is one sentence with not an "or" word but this neither word that applies to ALL three qualifications. If Obama can find a Morphologist to say otherwise, then WHO be that individual? and what Dictionary are they using? The George Orwell "Nineteen Eighty Four" Dictionary and the amendment to the "Doublespeak" by some Triple-speak!? You do not round up to the nearest whole number because you qualify in 2 of the 3 elements, or do you? If this were the case, then the Art. I, Sec. 2, Clause 3 "three fifths" persons did not need the fourteenth amendment. (;-) JSH
Post a Comment